Localizing AI data centers in Saudi Arabia faces scrutiny of human rights accountability and regional risks
Listen to this article
Read by Anchor
American company Together AI announced that it has signed an infrastructure deal with Saudi AI specialist HUMAIN, joining more than twelve U.S. technology firms, including Amazon Web Services, Luma AI and Oracle, which have entered contracts with the Saudi company since its founding in 2025 at the initiative of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. This rapid shift toward cloud computing is driven by broad popular and political opposition in the United States to expanding local data centers, as a poll conducted by NBC News in August found that 69 percent of respondents oppose building new data centers in their communities, with 57 percent of Republicans and 81 percent of Democrats expressing opposition, prompting major firms to look for more flexible environments beyond their borders.
The Kingdom's investment appeal rests on abundant land and low-cost electricity capable of powering intensive AI workloads, as well as the government's commitment to become a global computing hub within its broader plan to diversify the economy away from oil. This momentum materialized in the launch of Project Transcendence in 2024, a government-backed initiative worth $100 billion to expand data centers and develop technology partnerships. To support this massive expansion, HUMAIN appointed Goldman Sachs to raise at least $5.33 billion from credit and private-equity sources, while Blackstone announced a strategic partnership worth $3 billion to develop and manage the large-scale infrastructure together with HUMAIN and the AirTrunk platform. In turn, Together AI secured investments from prominent institutions including Kleiner Perkins, Koto Management, Lux Capital, General Catalyst, Salesforce Ventures, Nvidia's investment arm, Aramco Ventures, and Vista Equity Partners.
But moving the infrastructure abroad does not eliminate operational risks; it reproduces them in different forms.A report by the Starn Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University highlights geopolitical and climate challenges looming over these projects. Regional tensions and the Iran war have shown that data centers have become vital targets in conflicts, with Amazon facilities in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates having been targeted, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in April 2026 named eighteen American technology firms, including Apple, Google, IBM and Cisco, as legitimate targets in the Middle East. Environmentally, construction faces the burden of a harsh climate, as the International Labour Organization indicates that 83.6 percent of workers in Arab countries are exposed to excessive heat that leads to fatigue and kidney damage, while Human Rights Watch research shows that the highest levels of heat stress occur in the morning before the solar work ban that runs from noon to 3 p.m. takes effect.
These conditions coincide with heightened scrutiny of migrant labor hiring practices in the construction sector, most of whom come from South Asia after paying exorbitant recruitment fees equivalent to a full year’s income, with loans and annual interest rates reaching 50 percent, plunging them into a debt trap. Although Saudi Arabia approved a labor reform initiative in 2021, implementation gaps and restrictions on reporting violations place companies under the spotlight of international accountability as the 2034 World Cup approaches. The direct risk to Western firms and their investors lies in the expanding scope of legal actions under the U.S. Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), which imposes civil and criminal liability on entities that knowingly benefit from projects that rely on forced labor, alongside the European Union’s sustainability due-diligence directives that levy fines of up to 3 percent of total global revenue, rising to 5 percent in Germany.
This legal scrutiny reshapes planning and investment priorities for companies operating in the Gulf, Egypt and the region.Attracting computing giants and global capital no longer depends solely on offering energy and space; it requires local data-center operators and contractors to raise labor-compliance standards and apply rigorous due-diligence on supply chains and hiring, to avoid derailing financing rounds or exposing Western partners to costly international sanctions. For infrastructure and technology managers in banks and regional government entities that build their solutions on these clouds, localizing computing mandates a review of workload-distribution strategies and the assurance of business continuity against regional security threats, making the protection of facilities and backup systems a binding financial and operational pillar rather than a precautionary measure.
This trajectory shows that escaping Western local-community constraints does not mean evading international law or sidestepping precise financial calculations. With the Western financial system increasingly involved in funding regional AI infrastructure, due-diligence and operational security standards have become a decisive metric for the success and long-term sustainability of these technology alliances.